Home » Data » Tom, it’s a Professor Rogoff’s Secretary on the Phone with a question

Tom, it’s a Professor Rogoff’s Secretary on the Phone with a question

Thomas Herndon, BI, Exclusive: The Grad Student Who Took Down Reinhart And Rogoff Explains Why His Paper Refutes Their Main Result, here. She wants to know when your thesis defense is scheduled.

I want to address here what I feel are the major misinterpretations of  our work, which will in part require engaging with the claims made in Reinhart’s and Rogoff’s response. First, we categorically did not impute any negative motives to the authors; and second, our results are not consistent with and do not confirm their findings.

I want to start by stating in the strongest possible terms that the purpose of our paper was not to imply that the selective omissions and unconventional weighting were, as R&R asserted in response to us, “intentionally used to bias the results.” The purpose of our paper was strictly to ascertain the veracity of their results.  We know nothing whatsoever about their motives, and did not speculate on this at all in our paper. Throughout our paper we assume that their errors were honest mistakes. We also have honest differences over the appropriate methods for calculating average GDP growth figures.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/herndon-responds-to-reinhart-rogoff-2013-4#ixzz2RCMawURk

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: